Wallendbeen vs Wentworth
Property investment comparison - Wallendbeen, NSW 2590 vs Wentworth, NSW 2648
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Wallendbeen wins 1, Wentworth wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Wallendbeen | Wentworth |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $415K | $410K |
| Median unit price | $315K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.32% | 5.49% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.59% | 6.46% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.8% |
| Population | 299 | 1,577 |
Wallendbeen vs Wentworth: what the numbers say
The median house price is $415K in Wallendbeen and $410K in Wentworth, so Wentworth is the cheaper entry point, with Wallendbeen houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Wentworth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.49%, compared with 5.32% in Wallendbeen, a gap of 0.17 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Wallendbeen and 1.8% in Wentworth, so landlords in Wallendbeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wentworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,577 against 299, roughly 5 times the size of Wallendbeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wentworth for rental income, Wentworth for a lower purchase price, Wallendbeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison