Skip to main content

Walmsley vs Yokine

Property investment comparison - Walmsley, WA 6330 vs Yokine, WA 6060

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Walmsley wins 0, Yokine wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricWalmsleyYokine
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$755K$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.93%3.34%
Gross rental yield (units)3.86%4.96%
1-year house growth--
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.5%1.0%
Population4712,706

Walmsley vs Yokine: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Walmsley and $1.3M in Yokine, so Yokine is the cheaper entry point, with Walmsley houses about 3% dearer.

For units, Walmsley sits at a median of $755K against $720K in Yokine, which makes Yokine the more affordable unit market and Walmsley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Yokine leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.34%, compared with 2.93% in Walmsley, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Yokine and 2.5% in Walmsley, so landlords in Yokine face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yokine is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,706 against 47, roughly 270 times the size of Walmsley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yokine for rental income, Yokine for a lower purchase price, Yokine for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison