Wangoom vs Warragul
Property investment comparison - Wangoom, VIC 3279 vs Warragul, VIC 3820
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Wangoom wins 0, Warragul wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Wangoom | Warragul |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $695K | $695K |
| Median unit price | - | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.39% | 4.50% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +4.7% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.9% |
| Population | 237 | 19,856 |
Wangoom vs Warragul: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $695K in Wangoom and $695K in Warragul.
On cash flow, Warragul leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 3.39% in Wangoom, a gap of 1.11 percentage points.
Warragul is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,856 against 237, roughly 84 times the size of Wangoom; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Warragul for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison