Skip to main content

Whitelaw vs Yarraville

Property investment comparison - Whitelaw, VIC 3950 vs Yarraville, VIC 3013

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Whitelaw wins 2, Yarraville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricWhitelawYarraville
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$460K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.45%3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.27%5.12%
1-year house growth-+0.8%
3-year house growth-+9.1%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.7%
Population3015,636

Whitelaw vs Yarraville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Whitelaw and $1.2M in Yarraville.

For units, Whitelaw sits at a median of $460K against $620K in Yarraville, which makes Whitelaw the more affordable unit market and Yarraville the pricier one.

On cash flow, Yarraville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.45% in Whitelaw, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Whitelaw and 0.7% in Yarraville, so landlords in Whitelaw face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yarraville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,636 against 30, roughly 521 times the size of Whitelaw; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yarraville for rental income, Whitelaw for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison