Skip to main content

Wyreema vs Yeppoon

Property investment comparison - Wyreema, QLD 4352 vs Yeppoon, QLD 4703

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Wyreema wins 2, Yeppoon wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricWyreemaYeppoon
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price$1.3M$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.06%4.28%
Gross rental yield (units)1.40%-
1-year house growth-+11.3%
3-year house growth+62.8%+35.5%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.3%
Population2,0767,037

Wyreema vs Yeppoon: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Wyreema and $800K in Yeppoon.

For units, Wyreema sits at a median of $1.3M against $580K in Yeppoon, which makes Yeppoon the more affordable unit market and Wyreema the pricier one.

On cash flow, Yeppoon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.28%, compared with 4.06% in Wyreema, a gap of 0.22 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Wyreema houses are +62.8% and Yeppoon houses +35.5%, so Wyreema has compounded faster than Yeppoon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Wyreema and 1.3% in Yeppoon, so landlords in Wyreema face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yeppoon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,037 against 2,076, roughly 3.4 times the size of Wyreema; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yeppoon for rental income, Wyreema for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison