Abbey vs North Coogee
Property investment comparison - Abbey, WA 6280 vs North Coogee, WA 6163
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbey wins 2, North Coogee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbey | North Coogee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | - | $900K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.30% | 3.33% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.14% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +21.8%estimate | +6.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 2.0% |
| Population | 1,321 | 3,741 |
Abbey vs North Coogee: what the numbers say
On cash flow, North Coogee leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.33%, compared with 2.30% in Abbey, a gap of 1.03 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +21.8% in Abbey (an estimate) and +6.4% in North Coogee (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abbey, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Abbey and 2.0% in North Coogee, so landlords in Abbey face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
North Coogee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,741 against 1,321, roughly 2.8 times the size of Abbey; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: North Coogee for rental income, Abbey for recent price momentum, Abbey for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison