Skip to main content

Abbey vs Winthrop

Property investment comparison - Abbey, WA 6280 vs Winthrop, WA 6150

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbey wins 3, Winthrop wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbeyWinthrop
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.30%2.96%
Gross rental yield (units)4.14%1.75%
1-year house growth+21.8%estimate+12.4%
3-year house growth-+41.7%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.8%
Population1,3216,020

Abbey vs Winthrop: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Abbey and $1.8M in Winthrop, so Winthrop is the cheaper entry point, with Abbey houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Winthrop leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.96%, compared with 2.30% in Abbey, a gap of 0.66 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.8% in Abbey (an estimate) and +12.4% in Winthrop, so recent momentum favours Abbey, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Abbey and 1.8% in Winthrop, so landlords in Abbey face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Winthrop is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,020 against 1,321, roughly 4.6 times the size of Abbey; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Winthrop for rental income, Winthrop for a lower purchase price, Abbey for recent price momentum, Abbey for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison