Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Berrima

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Berrima, NSW 2577

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 2, Berrima wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyBerrima
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$650K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%5.72%
1-year house growth+10.8%-12.2%
3-year house growth+22.3%-18.6%
Vacancy rate5.2%4.6%
Population4,200813

Abbotsbury vs Berrima: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $650K in Berrima, which makes Berrima the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and -12.2% in Berrima, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, while Berrima went backwards.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Berrima houses -18.6%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Berrima over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 4.6% in Berrima and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Berrima face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 813, roughly 5 times the size of Berrima; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Berrima for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison