Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Bexley

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Bexley, NSW 2207

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 3, Bexley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyBexley
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$770K$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%3.96%
1-year house growth+10.8%+2.1%estimate
3-year house growth+22.3%-
Vacancy rate5.2%1.9%
Population4,20019,646

Abbotsbury vs Bexley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Abbotsbury and $1.8M in Bexley, so Bexley is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $850K in Bexley, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Bexley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +2.1% in Bexley (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Bexley and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Bexley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bexley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,646 against 4,200, roughly 4.7 times the size of Abbotsbury; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bexley for a lower purchase price, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Bexley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison