Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Coledale

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Coledale, NSW 2515

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 4, Coledale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyColedale
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%2.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%3.46%
1-year house growth+10.8%+3.9%
3-year house growth+22.3%-1.0%
Vacancy rate5.2%2.6%
Population4,2001,372

Abbotsbury vs Coledale: what the numbers say

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.81% in Abbotsbury and 2.80% in Coledale, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +3.9% in Coledale, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Coledale houses -1.0%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Coledale over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Coledale and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Coledale face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,372, roughly 3.1 times the size of Coledale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Coledale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison