Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Gables

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Gables, NSW 2765

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 4, Gables wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyGables
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$860K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%2.35%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%2.98%
1-year house growth+10.8%+14.2%
3-year house growth+22.3%+60.2%
Vacancy rate5.2%6.0%
Population4,2003,339

Abbotsbury vs Gables: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $860K in Gables, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Gables the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abbotsbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.81%, compared with 2.35% in Gables, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +14.2% in Gables, so recent momentum favours Gables, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Gables houses +60.2%, so Gables has compounded faster than Abbotsbury over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 5.2% in Abbotsbury and 6.0% in Gables, so landlords in Abbotsbury face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 3,339, larger than Gables; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for rental income, Gables for recent price momentum, Abbotsbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison