Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Kirrawee

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Kirrawee, NSW 2232

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 4, Kirrawee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyKirrawee
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$770K$920K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%4.35%
1-year house growth+10.8%+1.1%
3-year house growth+22.3%+13.5%
Vacancy rate5.2%1.4%
Population4,20011,007

Abbotsbury vs Kirrawee: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.8M in Abbotsbury and $1.8M in Kirrawee.

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $920K in Kirrawee, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Kirrawee the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +1.1% in Kirrawee, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Kirrawee houses +13.5%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Kirrawee over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Kirrawee and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Kirrawee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kirrawee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,007 against 4,200, roughly 2.6 times the size of Abbotsbury; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Kirrawee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison