Abbotsbury vs Kurraba Point
Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Kurraba Point, NSW 2089
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 3, Kurraba Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbotsbury | Kurraba Point |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $770K | $1.7M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.81% | 2.74% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.36% | 2.57% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +22.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 5.2% | 1.3% |
| Population | 4,200 | 1,401 |
Abbotsbury vs Kurraba Point: what the numbers say
For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $1.7M in Kurraba Point, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Kurraba Point the pricier one.
On cash flow, Abbotsbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.81%, compared with 2.74% in Kurraba Point, a gap of 0.07 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Kurraba Point and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Kurraba Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,401, roughly 3.0 times the size of Kurraba Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abbotsbury for rental income, Kurraba Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison