Abbotsbury vs Lagoon Grass
Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Lagoon Grass, NSW 2480
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 0, Lagoon Grass wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbotsbury | Lagoon Grass |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $770K | $460K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.81% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.36% | 5.03% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +22.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 5.2% | 5.2% |
| Population | 4,200 | 49 |
Abbotsbury vs Lagoon Grass: what the numbers say
For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $460K in Lagoon Grass, which makes Lagoon Grass the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 5.2%.
Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 49, roughly 86 times the size of Lagoon Grass; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison