Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Loomberah

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Loomberah, NSW 2340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 2, Loomberah wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyLoomberah
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%2.05%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%6.64%
1-year house growth+10.8%+13.2%
3-year house growth+22.3%-
Vacancy rate5.2%8.2%
Population4,200552

Abbotsbury vs Loomberah: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $365K in Loomberah, which makes Loomberah the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abbotsbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.81%, compared with 2.05% in Loomberah, a gap of 0.76 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +13.2% in Loomberah, so recent momentum favours Loomberah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 5.2% in Abbotsbury and 8.2% in Loomberah, so landlords in Abbotsbury face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 552, roughly 8 times the size of Loomberah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for rental income, Loomberah for recent price momentum, Abbotsbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison