Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Marulan

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Marulan, NSW 2579

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 3, Marulan wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyMarulan
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%4.05%
1-year house growth+10.8%+0.0%
3-year house growth+22.3%+4.8%
Vacancy rate5.2%1.4%
Population4,2001,428

Abbotsbury vs Marulan: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Marulan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 1.59 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +0.0% in Marulan, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Marulan houses +4.8%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Marulan over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Marulan and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Marulan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,428, roughly 2.9 times the size of Marulan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Marulan for rental income, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Marulan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison