Abbotsbury vs Mendooran

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $1.7M in Mendooran, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Mendooran the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mendooran leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.50%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 3.69 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +9.5% in Mendooran, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Mendooran houses +57.4%, so Mendooran has compounded faster than Abbotsbury over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Mendooran and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Mendooran face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 626, roughly 7 times the size of Mendooran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mendooran for rental income, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Mendooran for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.