Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Razorback

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Razorback, NSW 2571

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 4, Razorback wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyRazorback
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%1.65%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%2.28%
1-year house growth+10.8%+9.1%
3-year house growth+22.3%+12.3%
Vacancy rate5.2%3.1%
Population4,2001,174

Abbotsbury vs Razorback: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $670K in Razorback, which makes Razorback the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abbotsbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.81%, compared with 1.65% in Razorback, a gap of 1.16 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +9.1% in Razorback, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Razorback houses +12.3%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Razorback over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 3.1% in Razorback and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Razorback face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,174, roughly 3.6 times the size of Razorback; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for rental income, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Razorback for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison