Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Seahampton

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Seahampton, NSW 2286

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 3, Seahampton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburySeahampton
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$490K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%3.80%
1-year house growth+10.8%+9.4%
3-year house growth+22.3%+25.3%
Vacancy rate5.2%6.7%
Population4,200292

Abbotsbury vs Seahampton: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $490K in Seahampton, which makes Seahampton the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +9.4% in Seahampton, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Seahampton houses +25.3%, so Seahampton has compounded faster than Abbotsbury over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 5.2% in Abbotsbury and 6.7% in Seahampton, so landlords in Abbotsbury face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 292, roughly 14 times the size of Seahampton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Abbotsbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison