Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Tamworth

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Tamworth, NSW 2340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 0, Tamworth wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyTamworth
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%3.79%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%5.32%
1-year house growth+10.8%+15.1%
3-year house growth+22.3%+28.4%
Vacancy rate5.2%1.4%
Population4,200189

Abbotsbury vs Tamworth: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Tamworth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.79%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 0.98 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +15.1% in Tamworth, so recent momentum favours Tamworth, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Tamworth houses +28.4%, so Tamworth has compounded faster than Abbotsbury over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Tamworth and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Tamworth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 189, roughly 22 times the size of Tamworth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tamworth for rental income, Tamworth for recent price momentum, Tamworth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison