Abbotsbury vs The Lagoon
Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs The Lagoon, NSW 2795
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 1, The Lagoon wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbotsbury | The Lagoon |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $770K | $455K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.81% | 2.58% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.36% | 4.88% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +22.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 5.2% | 0.7% |
| Population | 4,200 | 268 |
Abbotsbury vs The Lagoon: what the numbers say
For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $455K in The Lagoon, which makes The Lagoon the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.
On cash flow, Abbotsbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.81%, compared with 2.58% in The Lagoon, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in The Lagoon and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in The Lagoon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 268, roughly 16 times the size of The Lagoon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abbotsbury for rental income, The Lagoon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison