Abbotsford vs Laughtondale
Property investment comparison - Abbotsford, NSW 2046 vs Laughtondale, NSW 2775
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsford wins 1, Laughtondale wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbotsford | Laughtondale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3.5M | - |
| Median unit price | $1.4M | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.25% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.11% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +0.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| Population | 5,431 | 102 |
Abbotsford vs Laughtondale: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Abbotsford and 2.6% in Laughtondale, so landlords in Abbotsford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Abbotsford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,431 against 102, roughly 53 times the size of Laughtondale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abbotsford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison