Skip to main content

Abbotsford vs Aspendale Gardens

Property investment comparison - Abbotsford, VIC 3067 vs Aspendale Gardens, VIC 3195

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsford wins 1, Aspendale Gardens wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsfordAspendale Gardens
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$540K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.29%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.38%
1-year house growth+1.2%estimate+5.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%1.8%
Population9,0886,427

Abbotsford vs Aspendale Gardens: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Abbotsford and $1.3M in Aspendale Gardens.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.2% in Abbotsford (an estimate) and +5.9% in Aspendale Gardens (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aspendale Gardens, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Abbotsford and 1.8% in Aspendale Gardens, so landlords in Abbotsford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,088 against 6,427, larger than Aspendale Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aspendale Gardens for recent price momentum, Abbotsford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison