Abercrombie vs Bexhill
Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Bexhill, NSW 2480
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Bexhill wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abercrombie | Bexhill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | - |
| Median unit price | $455K | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.22% | 5.04% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | +8.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +32.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 2.9% |
| Population | 1,127 | 528 |
Abercrombie vs Bexhill: what the numbers say
For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $450K in Bexhill, which makes Bexhill the more affordable unit market and Abercrombie the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +8.8% in Bexhill, so recent momentum favours Bexhill, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Abercrombie and 2.9% in Bexhill, so landlords in Abercrombie face less competition for tenants.
Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 528, roughly 2.1 times the size of Bexhill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bexhill for recent price momentum, Abercrombie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison