Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Breakfast Point

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Breakfast Point, NSW 2137

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Breakfast Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieBreakfast Point
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$1.5M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%2.31%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%-
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%2.3%
Population1,1274,678

Abercrombie vs Breakfast Point: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $1.5M in Breakfast Point, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Breakfast Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.31% in Breakfast Point, a gap of 1.63 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Breakfast Point and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Breakfast Point face less competition for tenants.

Breakfast Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,678 against 1,127, roughly 4.2 times the size of Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Breakfast Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison