Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Brunswick Heads

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Brunswick Heads, NSW 2483

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Brunswick Heads wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieBrunswick Heads
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%3.21%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+12.9%
3-year house growth-+24.6%
Vacancy rate2.6%0.5%
Population1,1271,905

Abercrombie vs Brunswick Heads: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $1.1M in Brunswick Heads, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Brunswick Heads the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +12.9% in Brunswick Heads, so recent momentum favours Brunswick Heads, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Brunswick Heads and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Brunswick Heads face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brunswick Heads is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,905 against 1,127, larger than Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brunswick Heads for recent price momentum, Brunswick Heads for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison