Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Byron Bay

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Byron Bay, NSW 2481

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Byron Bay wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieByron Bay
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%3.05%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%-
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate-0.9%
3-year house growth-+4.5%
Vacancy rate2.6%1.2%
Population1,1276,330

Abercrombie vs Byron Bay: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 3.05% in Byron Bay, a gap of 0.89 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and -0.9% in Byron Bay, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, while Byron Bay went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Byron Bay and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Byron Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Byron Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,330 against 1,127, roughly 6 times the size of Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Byron Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison