Abercrombie vs Canada Bay
Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Canada Bay, NSW 2046
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, Canada Bay wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abercrombie | Canada Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | - |
| Median unit price | $455K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | 1.71% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.22% | 3.50% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | +5.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +16.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| Population | 1,127 | 1,308 |
Abercrombie vs Canada Bay: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 1.71% in Canada Bay, a gap of 2.23 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +5.9% in Canada Bay, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Canada Bay and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Canada Bay face less competition for tenants.
Canada Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,308 against 1,127, larger than Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Canada Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison