Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Chillingham

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Chillingham, NSW 2484

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Chillingham wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieChillingham
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%6.11%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate-7.5%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%0.3%
Population1,127228

Abercrombie vs Chillingham: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $580K in Chillingham, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Chillingham the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and -7.5% in Chillingham, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, while Chillingham went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Chillingham and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Chillingham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 228, roughly 4.9 times the size of Chillingham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Chillingham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison