Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Daleys Point

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Daleys Point, NSW 2257

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 5, Daleys Point wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieDaleys Point
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$865K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%2.64%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%4.11%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+2.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%7.7%
Population1,127705

Abercrombie vs Daleys Point: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $865K in Daleys Point, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Daleys Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.64% in Daleys Point, a gap of 1.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +2.8% in Daleys Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Abercrombie and 7.7% in Daleys Point, so landlords in Abercrombie face less competition for tenants.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 705, larger than Daleys Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Abercrombie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison