Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Dunoon

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Dunoon, NSW 2480

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, Dunoon wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieDunoon
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%3.68%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%4.90%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+7.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.6%
Population1,127840

Abercrombie vs Dunoon: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $450K in Dunoon, which makes Dunoon the more affordable unit market and Abercrombie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 3.68% in Dunoon, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +7.4% in Dunoon (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Dunoon and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Dunoon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 840, larger than Dunoon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Dunoon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison