Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Durren Durren

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Durren Durren, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, Durren Durren wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieDurren Durren
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%2.05%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%5.21%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.3%
Population1,12796

Abercrombie vs Durren Durren: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $585K in Durren Durren, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Durren Durren the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.05% in Durren Durren, a gap of 1.89 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Durren Durren and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Durren Durren face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 96, roughly 12 times the size of Durren Durren; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Durren Durren for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison