Abercrombie vs Englorie Park
Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Englorie Park, NSW 2560
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Englorie Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abercrombie | Englorie Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | - |
| Median unit price | $455K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | 2.99% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.22% | 4.02% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 1.0% |
| Population | 1,127 | 361 |
Abercrombie vs Englorie Park: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.99% in Englorie Park, a gap of 0.95 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Englorie Park and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Englorie Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 361, roughly 3.1 times the size of Englorie Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Englorie Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison