Abercrombie vs Kangy Angy
Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Kangy Angy, NSW 2258
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, Kangy Angy wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abercrombie | Kangy Angy |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | - |
| Median unit price | $455K | $595K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | 3.08% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.22% | 4.45% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 1,127 | 331 |
Abercrombie vs Kangy Angy: what the numbers say
For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $595K in Kangy Angy, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Kangy Angy the pricier one.
On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 3.08% in Kangy Angy, a gap of 0.86 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Kangy Angy and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Kangy Angy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 331, roughly 3.4 times the size of Kangy Angy; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Kangy Angy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison