Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Llanarth

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Llanarth, NSW 2795

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Llanarth wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieLlanarth
Median house price$860K$860K
Median unit price$455K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%3.95%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%5.20%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+6.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.1%
Population1,1272,302

Abercrombie vs Llanarth: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $860K in Abercrombie and $860K in Llanarth.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.94% in Abercrombie and 3.95% in Llanarth, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +6.6% in Llanarth (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Llanarth and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Llanarth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Llanarth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,302 against 1,127, roughly 2.0 times the size of Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Llanarth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison