Abercrombie vs Mooney Mooney
Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Mooney Mooney, NSW 2083
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, Mooney Mooney wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abercrombie | Mooney Mooney |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | - |
| Median unit price | $455K | $810K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | 1.54% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.22% | 4.13% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Population | 1,127 | 350 |
Abercrombie vs Mooney Mooney: what the numbers say
For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $810K in Mooney Mooney, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Mooney Mooney the pricier one.
On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 1.54% in Mooney Mooney, a gap of 2.40 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Mooney Mooney and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Mooney Mooney face less competition for tenants.
Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 350, roughly 3.2 times the size of Mooney Mooney; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Mooney Mooney for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison