Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Mortlake

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Mortlake, NSW 2137

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, Mortlake wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieMortlake
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$825K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%1.90%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%-
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate-0.4%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%2.1%
Population1,1271,954

Abercrombie vs Mortlake: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $825K in Mortlake, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Mortlake the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 1.90% in Mortlake, a gap of 2.04 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and -0.4% in Mortlake, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, while Mortlake went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Mortlake and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Mortlake face less competition for tenants.

Mortlake is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,954 against 1,127, larger than Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Mortlake for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison