Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Mount Vincent

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Mount Vincent, NSW 2323

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Mount Vincent wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieMount Vincent
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%2.11%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%5.42%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%0.5%
Population1,127380

Abercrombie vs Mount Vincent: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $540K in Mount Vincent, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Mount Vincent the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.11% in Mount Vincent, a gap of 1.83 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Mount Vincent and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Mount Vincent face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 380, roughly 3.0 times the size of Mount Vincent; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Mount Vincent for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison