Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs North Wollongong

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs North Wollongong, NSW 2500

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, North Wollongong wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieNorth Wollongong
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$770K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%4.18%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+7.2%
3-year house growth--10.0%
Vacancy rate2.6%1.0%
Population1,1272,299

Abercrombie vs North Wollongong: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $770K in North Wollongong, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and North Wollongong the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +7.2% in North Wollongong, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in North Wollongong and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in North Wollongong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Wollongong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,299 against 1,127, roughly 2.0 times the size of Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for recent price momentum, North Wollongong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison