Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Otford

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Otford, NSW 2508

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 4, Otford wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieOtford
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%2.11%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%4.37%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate-0.1%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.2%
Population1,127396

Abercrombie vs Otford: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $910K in Otford, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Otford the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.11% in Otford, a gap of 1.83 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and -0.1% in Otford, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, while Otford went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Otford and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Otford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 396, roughly 2.8 times the size of Otford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Otford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison