Abercrombie vs Pheasants Nest
Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Pheasants Nest, NSW 2574
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, Pheasants Nest wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abercrombie | Pheasants Nest |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | - |
| Median unit price | $455K | $480K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.22% | 3.55% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 5.4% |
| Population | 1,127 | 716 |
Abercrombie vs Pheasants Nest: what the numbers say
For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $480K in Pheasants Nest, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Pheasants Nest the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Abercrombie and 5.4% in Pheasants Nest, so landlords in Abercrombie face less competition for tenants.
Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 716, larger than Pheasants Nest; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abercrombie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Pheasants Nest, NSW 2574
Open Pheasants Nest suburb profileRecent sales in Pheasants Nest
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison