Abercrombie vs Potts Hill
Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Potts Hill, NSW 2143
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, Potts Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abercrombie | Potts Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | - |
| Median unit price | $455K | $730K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | 2.89% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.22% | 4.92% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 0.7% |
| Population | 1,127 | 1,454 |
Abercrombie vs Potts Hill: what the numbers say
For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $730K in Potts Hill, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Potts Hill the pricier one.
On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.89% in Potts Hill, a gap of 1.05 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Potts Hill and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Potts Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Potts Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,454 against 1,127, larger than Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Potts Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison