Abercrombie vs Ramsgate Beach
Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Ramsgate Beach, NSW 2217
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 1, Ramsgate Beach wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abercrombie | Ramsgate Beach |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | - |
| Median unit price | $455K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.22% | 3.81% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| Population | 1,127 | 1,734 |
Abercrombie vs Ramsgate Beach: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Ramsgate Beach and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Ramsgate Beach face less competition for tenants.
Ramsgate Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,734 against 1,127, larger than Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ramsgate Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Ramsgate Beach, NSW 2217
Open Ramsgate Beach suburb profileRecent sales in Ramsgate Beach
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison