Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Rossmore

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Rossmore, NSW 2557

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 4, Rossmore wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieRossmore
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$905K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%0.92%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%3.84%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+1.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.4%
Population1,1272,241

Abercrombie vs Rossmore: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $905K in Rossmore, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Rossmore the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 0.92% in Rossmore, a gap of 3.02 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +1.2% in Rossmore (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Rossmore and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Rossmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rossmore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,241 against 1,127, larger than Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Rossmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison