Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Tirrannaville

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Tirrannaville, NSW 2580

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Tirrannaville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieTirrannaville
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$565K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%4.30%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+14.7%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.0%
Population1,127235

Abercrombie vs Tirrannaville: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $565K in Tirrannaville, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Tirrannaville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +14.7% in Tirrannaville, so recent momentum favours Tirrannaville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Tirrannaville and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Tirrannaville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 235, roughly 4.8 times the size of Tirrannaville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tirrannaville for recent price momentum, Tirrannaville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison