Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Yarrawonga Park

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Yarrawonga Park, NSW 2264

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Yarrawonga Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieYarrawonga Park
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%5.23%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+5.3%
3-year house growth-+12.7%
Vacancy rate2.6%2.4%
Population1,127390

Abercrombie vs Yarrawonga Park: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $585K in Yarrawonga Park, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Yarrawonga Park the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +5.3% in Yarrawonga Park, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Yarrawonga Park and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Yarrawonga Park face less competition for tenants.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 390, roughly 2.9 times the size of Yarrawonga Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Yarrawonga Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Abercrombie vs Yarrawonga Park: Suburb Comparison 2026