Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Brunswick Heads

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Brunswick Heads, NSW 2483

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 4, Brunswick Heads wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareBrunswick Heads
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%3.21%
1-year house growth+14.7%+12.9%
3-year house growth+32.0%+24.6%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.5%
Population2,5421,905

Aberdare vs Brunswick Heads: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $1.1M in Brunswick Heads, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Brunswick Heads the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +12.9% in Brunswick Heads, so recent momentum favours Aberdare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdare houses are +32.0% and Brunswick Heads houses +24.6%, so Aberdare has compounded faster than Brunswick Heads over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Brunswick Heads and 1.8% in Aberdare, so landlords in Brunswick Heads face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 1,905, larger than Brunswick Heads; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for recent price momentum, Brunswick Heads for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison