Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Daceyville

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Daceyville, NSW 2032

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 4, Daceyville wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareDaceyville
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$920K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%2.82%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%-
1-year house growth+14.7%-3.8%
3-year house growth+32.0%-
Vacancy rate1.8%2.5%
Population2,5421,146

Aberdare vs Daceyville: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $920K in Daceyville, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Daceyville the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.82% in Daceyville, a gap of 1.28 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and -3.8% in Daceyville, so recent momentum favours Aberdare, while Daceyville went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Aberdare and 2.5% in Daceyville, so landlords in Aberdare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 1,146, roughly 2.2 times the size of Daceyville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for recent price momentum, Aberdare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison