Aberdare vs Fingal Head
Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Fingal Head, NSW 2487
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 4, Fingal Head wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdare | Fingal Head |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | - |
| Median unit price | $550K | $1.2M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.43% | 3.79% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.7% | +9.4% |
| 3-year house growth | +32.0% | +1.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Population | 2,542 | 615 |
Aberdare vs Fingal Head: what the numbers say
For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $1.2M in Fingal Head, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Fingal Head the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +9.4% in Fingal Head, so recent momentum favours Aberdare, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Aberdare houses are +32.0% and Fingal Head houses +1.8%, so Aberdare has compounded faster than Fingal Head over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.8%.
Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 615, roughly 4.1 times the size of Fingal Head; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdare for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison