Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Fishing Point

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Fishing Point, NSW 2283

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 2, Fishing Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareFishing Point
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%5.18%
1-year house growth+14.7%+10.5%estimate
3-year house growth+32.0%-
Vacancy rate1.8%1.4%
Population2,5421,105

Aberdare vs Fishing Point: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $600K in Fishing Point, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Fishing Point the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +10.5% in Fishing Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aberdare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Fishing Point and 1.8% in Aberdare, so landlords in Fishing Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 1,105, roughly 2.3 times the size of Fishing Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for recent price momentum, Fishing Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison